My writing room in full Christmas mode |
There comes a time in every writer's life when you feel your manuscript needs to be read by an editor. Sending to beta readers will help, but unless they have the experience, they won't pick up things an editor would. But then there's the expense. I have to admit that unless I'm going to make money on my books, I can't keep paying out for editors. And for those on a low income, these professional services are a dream they cannot afford. I've even heard some writers dismiss editors because they clearly don't understand the work. I do think most editors want the best for your work, and to be fair, these editors people were slating worked for publishers. Now I do think they can take over to the extent that I've heard people say that the book no longer feels theirs.
The first critique I had on a manuscript last year (not a developmental edit) was a shock to the system, but the lady was so nice and we spoke for an hour as she guided me through how I could go about the edits. I believe she was right with her advice and my novella improved because of her.
This time I thought I'd go through Reedsy, a writing website in the USA, for my novella-in-flash. They offer a list of editors with the type of edits they offer and the genres they work with. Of course there are a lot of US editors, but I wanted a UK editor. I chose two to approach, but went with one whose timescale was better for me. What I had stupidly not realised is that Reedsy takes a cut before paying the editor. This is around £45. The guy I worked with was actually American, but living in the UK. My main concern was that my novella was only about 15,000 words, whereas a novel would be around 80,000 and I did query the fee. The other editor had quoted the same fee, so I was beginning to wonder if this was a set fee. I had paid a bit less than this for the critique (but it wasn't a full developmental edit that time).
So the expense is something you have to prepare yourself for, if you go down this route. The second thing you have to prepare yourself for is the actual report. Boy, it can be brutal! All I can tell you is how I react. Everyone is different, but I'm betting not that different. I couldn't read the whole of the editorial edits, because my feelings were getting in the way. The words were not going in anymore. I glimpsed at the developmental edits and gave up. I walked away from it all and had a sleepless night thinking I was a hopeless writer, and there was nothing in it my editor liked. I have to say, it felt he made more negative remarks and only a few positive ones. That could have been my view because I was so upset. My immediate reaction was to ditch the whole project. I couldn't reply to him because I was both angry and upset and I know I cannot respond to people when I feel like this. So I left things a couple of days. I returned to his editorial, printed it off and highlighted the things most important, and I made my own notes. This is something I did for the critique I had last year. It helped to focus my thoughts. I then left it some more before typing a reply to the editor. Everything goes through Reedsy, so I typed my reply in a Word document and left it another day to sit. Then I made amendments before pasting it into the reply box of Reedsy. I had calmed down a lot by then and saw the manuscript in a different light.
Most of what my editor said was right, and on reflection, I may have submitted this one too early, but I know I needed help. The timeline was confusing for the reader, and I needed to flush out the main character in more detail. These things I am gradually working on now. My editor was helpful with advice, and I actually re-wrote the first two sections and sent them to him, asking if this was a better start. He confirmed I was on the right track, and he gave me a list of novellas I might like to read to get a better idea of how these books work.
My novella-in-flash was written non-linear and now I am changing this to chronological order initially, editing as I go. Some pieces might be flashbacks. Once it is all or in order, there will be a second edit and hopefully it will read better and I can take it forward. So, after all that, the advice was good, and I believe what I am writing now will be stronger. Would I use Reedsy again? Probably not to find an editor. I kept getting emails reminding me that it is usual to approach five editors. Why, if I've found what I want? And then kept sending me more suggestions, which I no longer wanted. Payment is through Reedsy in four instalments over the month you work with your chosen editor. The developmental edit is thorough and deep, and I have still not read all the notes. I will do this as I rearrange each section.
I guess I wanted to see what Reedsy would offer, but I would look around elsewhere another time. One of the reasons I chose my editor was because he focussed on novellas-in-flash. I also wanted a male perspective on my work, as my main character is male and usually my readers are women!
If you are a member of The Alliance of Independent Authors you can find an editor through them and gain a discount on fees. I'm no longer a member, but their list is still one of the best. If you know people in the business, even better. However you go about using the services of an editor, it will be scary, emotional, but they do know what they are talking about. As to the cost, it might be beyond some, but look around and ask around. It is also important to choose an editor right for your work/genre.
On a totally different theme, I want to mention Robin Houghton's great poetry spreadsheet of small presses accepting work. It tells you when windows open, if there is a reading fee, a payment and what they are looking for, along with links to websites. I find this a brilliant resource and have found small presses I've never heard of before and had successes with them. Do sign up. It's free.